Saturday 24 January 2015

Books Are Always Written In Chapters Aren’t They?





The answer is both yes and know. This is because writing a book is not immediately confined to a set layout. The chapter system has proven its worth over the centuries of novel writing because it is useful for organizing the story and for giving the reader timely breaks should they need them without losing their place when they come back to pick up the action again.

I do not use chapters when writing the first draft, however. The reason for this is that I believe that it is important to get the actual idea of the story down as soon as possible. For me the first draft is a crucial part of doing this and getting distracted by formulating a chapter matrix is a hindrance. I might insert breaks in the manuscript that I think are logical but they are not set in stone. In fact they invariably never survive.

The question of how to organise the book only really surfaces when I approach the end of the first draft (actually I usually never complete the first draft). By this point I have a very good idea of what the story is, the themes, the main characters, the plot and everything else. This is when some organisation is needed.

For ‘The War Wolf’ I quickly realised that a standard Chapter One, Chapter 2, etc., simply was not going to work. This was because the action, once it started in 1066, occurred in a very brief space of time. It seemed better to me to use each day as a chapter and group the events in the story accordingly. This gave me a very strict framework to work within and removed the need to consider how many chapters I needed to write.

I applied exactly the same approach to ‘For Rapture of Ravens, which was logical as it followed on directly from ‘The War Wolf’ and if you are writing a series then readers generally appreciate a degree of consistency. However, for my next novel, ‘Eugenica’, I was straying away from the early medieval period to something much closer to home; the 1930’s.

For this project I did actually attempt to write the first draft in chapters. I created folders on my computer and inserted first draft file copies into them accordingly. It did not work however. The reasons for this were numerous. First, there was my approach to writing; getting the ideas down as quickly as possible and leaving the polishing for the first re-write. I get so deep into the writing that I lose track of time, never mind all the finer points of constructing a book. I quickly found that my ideas were running much faster than the chapter system and trying to keep up proved frustrating so I effectively abandoned it. Another reason was the emergence of other stories within the main story. There was an awful lot going on between the characters and even independently as well.

Once I got the first draft as close to completion as I wanted to I took the time to step back and consider the organisation of the book. I quickly noticed that in trying to write it chapter by chapter I had not done myself any favours; plot-wise it was a mess! Events were not happening in a chronological order if I maintained my original chapter matrix. Obviously I had to abandon it.

That might seem a little radical but really it is not. I believe that my problem was that I was trying to force my story into a system of organisation that was poorly thought out at the beginning. Serves me right for allowing myself to become a slave to convention. I decided to use each individual day as the basis of the chapter organisation. It was similar to what I had done before but the reason for doing it was different. In writing ‘The Sorrow Song Trilogy’ actual historical events were the determining factor. ‘Eugenica’ is an alternative history novel, however, and so it not so closely tied to the actual history of the day. It was one of the major themes of the book that decided the issue.

When I re-read the first draft I realised that there were two stories that were mirroring each other. Both featured a journey, one by airship and the other by bus and then by any means possible. The journeys were triangular, returning to their points of origin. In the airship the theoretical consequences of eugenics are discussed by a congress of savants in superb luxury. In the other journey disabled people experience the practical implications of that same theory when it is applied to them. I did not set out to write the story in this way; it grew and developed as I wrote the first draft. I could see the attraction of it, however, as a vehicle for telling the story. This is where another determining factor came into play. The airship completes its’ triangular flight, Britain to America, America to Germany, Germany to Britain, within a definite timeframe; approximately nine days.

I reviewed the other part of the story and realised that it benefitted greatly from an immediate increase in tension if played out over a relatively short period of time. The move from apparently benign treatment of the main protagonists to a fight for life is accelerated and the tempo of the story picks at a speed much faster than the apparently casual progress of the airship might suggest. It made sense to use each day as a chapter.

When a reader opens ‘Eugenica’ they will see an instantly recognisable table of contents arranged in traditional headings; Chapter One, Chapter Two, etc., but these are not the elements that define the book’s actual organisation. Beneath those headings will be the real determining factors of how the events in the story are organised and presented to the reader. You might read it from Chapter One through to Chapter Nine but that is certainly not how I wrote it!

Tuesday 13 January 2015

Charity begins on the phone but not again.




I agree with giving to charity. I think that it is a moral imperative that if you can give afford to give a little then, as a human being witnessing the despair of another human being, even through removed mediums like television, the press, and the internet, that you should do something. Last year I responded to the UNICEF appeal for children in Syria caught up in the deadly fighting. No big deal, I did not donate a fortune, just what I could afford at the time. It felt like doing the right thing.

A few days after I made my donation I received a call from a private number. I do not normally answer unrecognised numbers but this time I did. A young man went into a scripted speech of how grateful UNICEF was for my act of kindness, now if only I could see my way to making another, bigger, donation or how about taking out a direct debit and paying just £5 a month?

Straight away I got it. The psychology is pretty basic, complement the person, build them up, then hit them with a sob story and ask for more money. It has very little to do with charity. I told the caller that I had given what I could afford and that I as I already supported two charities through monthly subscriptions then I did not feel that I could take on a third. This represented no problem to the UNICEF spokesman, he just told me to ditch one of the two and take on his charity instead!

Being English I tend to be polite even when annoyed and I politely told him that I would not do that and that I could not at that time make another donation to UNICEF. He asked if he could call back and I respectfully said no because my mind was made up. The next day the same telephone number appeared on my mobile again as it busily played The Rolling Stones’ ‘Brown Sugar’ to alert me of an incoming call. I did not answer it or the several other calls that followed over the next few weeks.

They don’t take no for an answer, well not immediately anyway.

A few months later I was moved by an advert on television by Save the Children and, totally forgetting my UNICEF experience, I used my mobile to make another donation. It probably will not surprise anyone reading this to discover that a charity representative was quick to start ringing me; it was only my sluggish brain that got caught out. I did not answer the calls, however, but instead entered the telephone number into Google and discovered it was the money raising arm of Save the Children. I also read several complaints from other people who resented this unasked for approach from charity fundraisers after making a donation in good faith.

I have now vowed not to use my mobile to make any charity donations ever again. It is not the slight annoyance of unsolicited telephone calls that prompts me to this decision, it the lack of respect and genuine appreciation that the charity fundraisers give my donation. To them my donation paid through my telephone is a valuable piece of information; my mobile’s number! Armed with this they can ring me and make me feel guilty about the paltry sum that I offered, convince me to sign up for a monthly subscription, and may be even get me to make a larger one off donation. Then in a couple of months’ time they can ring me back and try and get me to increase my contributions.

Make a donation through your mobile phone and you become a cash cow or so it seems.

The two charities that I have supported for many years through monthly subscription have something in common; neither has contacted me to ask me increase the amount of money I give them. They both send me updates on their work, by email now instead of printed matter, and if I feel able then I make an extra donation. I also shop in charity outlets on the high-street by the way. I believe in charity.

I am not a cash cow I am a human being with an ounce of compassion of fellow human beings and I do what I can when I can. I find it rather telling that paid professional fundraiser for large charities treat my effort with such cynicism whereas the people I see selling copies of the ‘Big Issue’ on the street never fail to be polite whenever I buy a copy from them; and they never ask me for more money either.

The point for me is that by displaying just a little gratitude for my efforts the two charities that I do support, and the ‘Big Issue’ sellers, get more money from me in the long run. The artificial, even cynical, approach of the professional fundraisers just turns me off to giving to them ever again, which cannot be good. The whole point of charity is surely the provision of relief for human beings by human beings? The key component is not money, which is just a tool for use, it is people and when the fundraisers fail to appreciate that fact then they are not going about their business in the proper manner.

Saturday 3 January 2015

2015 is Here!




As I posted previously I don’t place too much currency in the New Year but one thing that you cannot deny is that the year 2014 has indeed changed into 2015. Does that mean anything significant to me? Yes, actually it does indeed. I have various ambitions that I want to fulfil in 2015, not necessarily resolutions, just things that I have decided prior to New Year’s Eve that I want to either complete or experience.

In my capacity as a writer I have two major aims, which are, to complete the Sorrow Song Trilogy by October 2015 and, before that, to publish Eugenica, an alternative history novel set in 1930’s England. Neither of these two projects are particularly easy but then there would be no fun in it if they were (or quality in the writing I suspect). I can state that both books are underway, however, which is always a good place to be.

On a more personal note I am looking forward to whisking my wife away to Paris for our wedding anniversary, hopefully sometime around spring. Is this something of a cliché? More than likely but what does that matter? I have never been to Paris before and it is a city that I have always wanted to visit. To do so in the company of a beautiful woman is not a cliché, it is a life affirming moment and we live in the moment. To stroll through Paris with her hand in mine, to clink wine glasses and toast each other in a café, to visit the Louvre and wallow in the culture of Europe, these are events to be shared with someone that you love.

Of course in between then and now there’s all the usual mundane aspects of life to endure. This is something that we all have to deal with, it is a part of human existence. It can seem tedious and boring but then if it was not we would not invent occurrences such as Christmas. Festivals like this are the peaks towards which we aspire during our normal everyday lives. They do not just mark the passage of time, they give us something to look forward to. They raise expectation and increase our interest in life. Having projects like completing a book are similar to holidays and festivals, they are events to look forward to, only the scale is different, but even that is a question of perspective. For me publishing another book is a very big deal indeed. It is a time of excitement and for enjoying an accomplishment. It is another of those life affirming moments like visiting a city you have always wanted to experience.

In this respect 2015 is no little different to 2014. I had many enjoyable experiences last year and some notable achievements as well. I am hoping that the New Year will be much the same, hopefully even a little better. Actually I won’t be relying on hope too much, I’ll be working to improve on what I did last year just like I always have. So with that determination I wish you all the best for 2015 and sincerely hope that you achieve everything that you set out to do.